Garnet Erickson v. Curtis Investment Garnet Erickson v. Curtis Investment

Garnet Erickson v. Curtis Investment

MN.676 , 447 N.W.2d 165 (1989)

    • € 0,99
    • € 0,99

Beschrijving uitgever

1. A parking ramp owes a duty to use reasonable care to deter criminal activity on its premises which may cause personal harm
to its customers. 2. In this case, the security firm hired to patrol the ramp by the ramp's owner owed a duty of care to ramp patrons who were
customers of the ramp's lessee, and a question of fact exists on the discharge of that duty and on causation.

GENRE
Professioneel en technisch
UITGEGEVEN
1989
27 oktober
TAAL
EN
Engels
LENGTE
15
Pagina's
UITGEVER
LawApp Publishers
GROOTTE
67,4
kB

Meer boeken van En Banc Supreme Court of Minnesota

James D. Armstrong v. Potlatch Corporation James D. Armstrong v. Potlatch Corporation
1988
State Ex Rel. Louis Haak v. Board State Ex Rel. Louis Haak v. Board
1985
Marvis Stensland v. County Faribault Marvis Stensland v. County Faribault
1985
Janet Swenson v. Emerson Electric Company Janet Swenson v. Emerson Electric Company
1985
Norman Cairl v. City St. Paul Norman Cairl v. City St. Paul
1978
State Minnesota v. Herbert Daniel Notch State Minnesota v. Herbert Daniel Notch
1989