Haas Enterprises, Inc. v. Davis Haas Enterprises, Inc. v. Davis

Haas Enterprises, Inc. v. Davis

134 N.M. 675, 82 P.3d 42, 2003 -NMCA- 143, NM.0000158(2003)

    • € 0,99
    • € 0,99

Beschrijving uitgever

OPINION ¶1 The issue we address here is: When did the statute of limitations in this accountant's malpractice case begin to run? Haas Enterprises, Inc. sued Bruce Davis on an unsecured promissory note. Bruce, his father Dr. B.J. Davis, and Dr. Davis's medical practice, Davis P.C., in turn filed a counterclaim and third-party complaint against Haas Enterprises for its failure to file certain tax returns on its behalf for a number of years. 1 Haas Enterprises then defended on the basis that the statute of limitations had run on the claim.

GENRE
Professioneel en technisch
UITGEGEVEN
2003
24 september
TAAL
EN
Engels
LENGTE
10
Pagina's
UITGEVER
LawApp Publishers
GROOTTE
65,2
kB

Meer boeken van In the Court of Appeals of the State of New Mexico

Akins v. United Steelworkers of America Akins v. United Steelworkers of America
2009
Ortiz v. Overland Express Ortiz v. Overland Express
2009
Capco Acquisub, Inc. v. Greka Energy Corp. Capco Acquisub, Inc. v. Greka Energy Corp.
2008
State v. Harrison State v. Harrison
2008
State v. Myers State v. Myers
2008
State v. Santiago State v. Santiago
2008