![Hall v. Barlow](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Hall v. Barlow](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Hall v. Barlow
MD.40500; 272 A.2d 386; 260 Md. 327 (1971)
-
- € 0,99
-
- € 0,99
Publisher Description
The appellants brought this action in contract premised on the appellee's breach of implied warranty in failing to obtain the endorsement of The Barlow Corporation on a purchase money promissory note on which $316,800.00 was due and owing.1 Moorman, J., sitting without a jury found the claim barred by limitations; however, anticipating the possibility of appeal and seeking to relieve the parties from circuitous litigation, the court proceeded to decide the case on its merits, finding in favor of the appellee-defendant. For the reasons which follow, we think the judgment of the lower court should be reversed.