![Harold Goldstein Et Al. v. Harry Siegel Et Al.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Harold Goldstein Et Al. v. Harry Siegel Et Al.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Harold Goldstein Et Al. v. Harry Siegel Et Al.
NY.43759; 244 N.Y.S.2d 378; 19 A.D.2d 489 (1963)
-
- € 0,99
-
- € 0,99
Publisher Description
Plaintiffs appeal from order dismissing complaint for legal insufficiency. It contains three causes of action, the first for abuse of legal process, the second for false arrest, and the third for malicious prosecution. Each of the causes of action is insufficient and the order should be affirmed but with further leave to plaintiffs to serve an amended complaint.