![Harris v. State](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Harris v. State](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Harris v. State
880 A.2d 1047, 2005.DE.0000552
-
- € 0,99
-
- € 0,99
Publisher Description
(1) The defendant-appellant, Reginald Harris, appeals from his convictions on various drug and weapons offenses following a jury trial in the Superior Court. Harris takes issue with two rulings made by the Superior Court that denied his motion to suppress and motion for a mistrial. We conclude that the Superior Court did not commit legal error or abuse its discretion in either of its rulings. Accordingly, we affirm.