In Re Allstate County Mutual Insurance Co. In Re Allstate County Mutual Insurance Co.

In Re Allstate County Mutual Insurance Co‪.‬

227 S.W.3D 667, 50 TEX. SUP. CT. J. 902, 2007.TX.0004820

    • € 0,99
    • € 0,99

Beschrijving uitgever

Discovery is a tool to make the trial process more focused, not a weapon to make it more expensive. Thus trial courts "must make an effort to impose reasonable discovery limits." In re CSX Corp., 124 S.W.3d 149, 152 (Tex. 2003) (per curiam) (quotations omitted). In this suit alleging an insurer reneged on a $13,500 settlement offer, the trial court refused to impose any limit on the plaintiffs 213 discovery requests. As much of this discovery has no relation or relevance to the scope of the parties dispute, we grant mandamus relief. See In re Graco Childrens Prods., Inc., 210 S.W.3d 598, 600 (Tex. 2006) (per curiam) ("[An] order that compels overly broad discovery well outside the bounds of proper discovery is an abuse of discretion for which mandamus is the proper remedy.") (quotations omitted).

GENRE
Professioneel en technisch
UITGEGEVEN
2007
15 juni
TAAL
EN
Engels
LENGTE
4
Pagina's
UITGEVER
LawApp Publishers
GROOTTE
63,8
kB

Meer boeken van Division One Court of Appeals of Washington

Interchange Associates v. Interchange Inc. Interchange Associates v. Interchange Inc.
1976
In re Personal Restraint Petition of Lonnie Lee Burton In re Personal Restraint Petition of Lonnie Lee Burton
1996
Washington v. Farmer Washington v. Farmer
1996
Birchler v. Castello Land Co. Birchler v. Castello Land Co.
1996
Barry v. Johns Barry v. Johns
1996
Washington v. Drew Washington v. Drew
1995