![In Re Biggs](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![In Re Biggs](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
In Re Biggs
377 F.3D 515, 2004 FED.APP. 0250P, 2004.C06.0000254
-
- € 0,99
-
- € 0,99
Publisher Description
In this bankruptcy case, Ocwen Federal Bank claims that a deed of trust is valid against subsequent purchasers of the property, even though the required acknowledgment omits the names of the individuals purporting to acknowledge their signatures on the deed. The bankruptcy and district courts each held that a deed of trust omitting this information was invalid under Tennessee law, and so do we. We affirm.