In Re Canales In Re Canales

In Re Canales

    • € 0,99
    • € 0,99

Beschrijving uitgever

In these consolidated mandamus petitions, we must decide whether real party in interest Cynthia Barrera's objection to a visiting judge under section 74.053 of the Texas Government Code was timely although not made until after the judge had heard and ruled on pretrial matters in the case. Because we conclude that the statute contemplates that objections be made before the first hearing over which the visiting judge is to preside in a case rather than to a particular assignment order, Barrera's objection was untimely and the trial court properly rejected it. The court of appeals therefore abused its discretion in conditionally granting Barrera a writ of mandamus.

GENRE
Professioneel en technisch
UITGEGEVEN
2001
1 februari
TAAL
EN
Engels
LENGTE
11
Pagina's
UITGEVER
LawApp Publishers
GROOTTE
57,4
kB

Meer boeken van Texas Supreme Court

Meeks v. Rosa Meeks v. Rosa
1999
Lopez v. Munoz Lopez v. Munoz
2000
Union Pacific Resources Co. v. Hutchison Union Pacific Resources Co. v. Hutchison
1999
PeÑA v. PeÑA PeÑA v. PeÑA
1999
Kroger Co. v. Robins Kroger Co. v. Robins
1999
Catterson v. Martin Catterson v. Martin
1999