![In Re Cesar L.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![In Re Cesar L.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
In Re Cesar L.
654 S.E.2D 373, 221 W.VA. 249, 2007.WV.0000073
-
- € 0,99
-
- € 0,99
Publisher Description
The appellant herein and respondent below, Tameka L. M. L. [hereinafter "Tameka" or "mother"], appeals from orders entered October 11, 2006, and December 14, 2006, by the Circuit Court of Berkeley County. By order entered October 11, 2006, the circuit court determined that the mother does not have standing to request a modification of the minor childs, Cesar L.s [hereinafter "Cesar"], disposition in accordance with W. Va. Code § 49-6-6 (1977) (Repl. Vol. 2004) because she had voluntarily relinquished her parental rights and, thus, was no longer Cesars parent. In response to this ruling, Tameka then sought to withdraw her earlier relinquishment. By order entered December 14, 2006, the circuit court found that Tamekas relinquishment was voluntary and free of fraud and duress and, accordingly, that it was a valid voluntary relinquishment pursuant to W. Va. Code § 49-6-7 (1977) (Repl. Vol. 2004). On appeal to this Court, Tameka claims that the circuit court erred by finding that she does not have standing to request a modification in Cesars disposition and by refusing to set aside her voluntary relinquishment. Upon a review of the parties arguments, the record of this matter, and the pertinent authorities, we affirm the October 11, 2006, and December 14, 2006, orders of the Berkeley County Circuit Court.