In Re Child Of P.T. In Re Child Of P.T.

In Re Child Of P.T‪.‬

    • € 0,99
    • € 0,99

Publisher Description

Appellants' parental rights to their first four children were involuntarily terminated. Appellants now challenge the involuntary termination of their parental rights to their fifth child, M.T. Minn. Stat. §á260C.301, subd.á1(b)(4) (2002), creates a presumption of palpable unfitness to be a party to the parent-and-child relationship where parental rights to another child have been previously involuntarily terminated. In these circumstances, there is no requirement that reasonable efforts be made to rehabilitate and reunify the parents prior to a termination of parental rights. Minn. Stat. §á260C.001, subd.á3 (2002). Appellants argue that the statutory presumption of palpable unfitness in section 260C.301, subdivision 1(b)(4), unconstitutionally eliminates judicial review of an agency's reasonable efforts at rehabilitation and reunification, and violates appellants' due process and equal protection rights. Appellants also argue that the record does not support by clear and convincing evidence that appellants are palpably unfit to parent. We affirm.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2003
4 March
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
27
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
60.4
KB

More Books by Minnesota Court of Appeals

In re Civil Commitment of Ramey In re Civil Commitment of Ramey
2002
Andrew L. Youngquist, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co. Andrew L. Youngquist, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.
2001
State v. Pearson State v. Pearson
2000
Juelich v. Yamazaki Mazak Optionics Corp. Juelich v. Yamazaki Mazak Optionics Corp.
2003
In re Children of Wildey In re Children of Wildey
2003
Tollefson Development, Inc. v. Mccarthy Tollefson Development, Inc. v. Mccarthy
2003