In Re Commitment of Luitze

1. Charles E. Luitze appeals from a circuit court order revoking his supervised release from his Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (2001-02) commitment upon a finding that Luitze is a danger to the community because he did not properly participate in sex offender treatment. On appeal, Luitze challenges the sufficiency of the evidence that he is a danger to the community and argues that the circuit court misused its discretion by not considering alternatives to revocation of his supervised release. We conclude that the evidence was sufficient and the circuit court was not required to consider alternatives to revocation. State v. Burris, 2004 WI 91, 2, ___ Wis. 2d ___, 682 N.W.2d 812. Therefore, we affirm.