In Re Marriage of Cheryl C. Van Camp In Re Marriage of Cheryl C. Van Camp

In Re Marriage of Cheryl C. Van Camp

1996.WA.40129 ; 918 P.2d 509; 82 Wash. App. 339

    • € 0,99
    • € 0,99

Publisher Description

SWEENEY, C.J. --One commonly used method for determining reasonable attorney fees is the lodestar formula. The lodestar formula is applied by first determining the number of professional hours spent on a case, then multiplying that number by the reasonable hourly fee, and adjusting the resulting sum up or down based on a series of factors. Bowles v. Department of Retirement Sys., 121 Wash. 2d 52, 72, 847 P.2d 440 (1993). In this dissolution action, the trial court rejected the husbands proposal to base attorney fees on the lodestar formula and instead considered those factors traditionally applied in determining attorney fees in a dissolution case--need, ability and equity. RCW 26.09.140; Richards v. Richards, 5 Wash. App. 609, 614, 489 P.2d 928 (1971). The question presented is whether we should require application of the lodestar formula to calculate attorney fees in a dissolution action. Concluding we should not, we affirm the decision of the trial court, remanding in part for recalculation of costs.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1996
18 June
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
4
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
64
KB

More Books by Division Three, Panel Two Court of Appeals of Washington

In Re Welfare Of A.J.R. Sharon T. Robinson And Marty F. Robinson In Re Welfare Of A.J.R. Sharon T. Robinson And Marty F. Robinson
1995
In Re Marriage Of Gillespie In Re Marriage Of Gillespie
1995
In Re Marriage of Duffy In Re Marriage of Duffy
1995
Indian Trail Property Owner's Association V. City Of Spokane Indian Trail Property Owner's Association V. City Of Spokane
1994
In Re Johnson-Skay In Re Johnson-Skay
1996
In Re Marriage Of Hansen In Re Marriage Of Hansen
1996