Johnson v. Miller

May 1, 1991, Submitted: After preliminary examination of the briefs, the court notified the parties that it had tentatively
concluded that oral argument would not be helpful to the court in this case. The notice provided that any party might file
a "Statement as to Need of Oral Argument." See Rule 34(a), Fed. R. App. P.; Circuit Rule 34 (f). Johnson has filed such a
statement and requested oral argument. Upon consideration of that statement, the briefs, and the record, the request for oral
argument is denied and the appeal is submitted on the briefs and record.