![Lamajak, Inc. v. Frazin](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Lamajak, Inc. v. Frazin](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Lamajak, Inc. v. Frazin
230 S.W.3D 786, 2007.TX.0005571
-
- € 0,99
-
- € 0,99
Publisher Description
Following a jury trial, the trial court rendered judgment upon appellee Timothy Frazins election to recover the jurys award for breach of contract damages. In its appeal from the trial courts judgment, Lamajak, Inc. first contends the trial court erred in failing to apply the doctrine of res judicata to bar all of Frazins claims and, further, abused its discretion in denying it leave to file a trial amendment on the issue. Lamajak next contends there is no evidence or insufficient evidence to support the jurys verdict in favor of Frazin and the attorneys fees awarded to him. Finally, Lamajak claims the amount of prejudgment interest awarded is incorrect and should be recalculated.