![Lassen v. Curtis](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Lassen v. Curtis](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Lassen v. Curtis
WA.40221; 241 P.2d 210; 40 Wash. 2d 82 (1952)
-
- € 0,99
-
- € 0,99
Publisher Description
[40 Wash2d Page 83] The single question presented is this: Where a decree awarding personal judgment for the balance due on a promissory note and foreclosing a chattel mortgage given to secure the note fails to make specific provision for a deficiency judgment, must the judgment creditor look only to the mortgaged property in satisfying the judgment?