![Laudeman v. Laudeman](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Laudeman v. Laudeman](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Laudeman v. Laudeman
92 CAL.APP.4TH 1009, 112 CAL.RPTR.2D 378, 2001.CA.0000967 , 1 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 8742, 2001 DAILY JOURNAL D.A.R. 10,819
-
- € 0,99
-
- € 0,99
Publisher Description
Todd A. Harris appeals from a judgment confirming an arbitration award in favor of Rosalie M. Sandro and the Rosalie M. Sandro Revocable Trust dated September 27, 1991 (collectively, Sandro). Harris contends the arbitrator exceeded his powers when he determined that Harris had no estate, title or interest in the property, failed to compel specific performance of the option agreement, and awarded attorneys fees and costs to Sandro. Harris further contends the arbitrator committed misconduct by failing to provide a basis for the award. We affirm.