![Nakamoto v. Ashcroft](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Nakamoto v. Ashcroft](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Nakamoto v. Ashcroft
363 F.3D 874, 2004.C09.0000218 , 2004 DAILY JOURNAL D.A.R. 4028, 4 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 2807
-
- € 0,99
-
- € 0,99
Publisher Description
We hold today that when the parties treat a fully dispositive summary judgment order as if it were a final judgment, the requirement in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 that the judgment "be set forth on a separate document" can be waived. Bankers Trust Co. v. Mallis, 435 U.S. 381, 382 (1978).