P. Chimento Co. v. Banco Popular De Puerto Rico P. Chimento Co. v. Banco Popular De Puerto Rico

P. Chimento Co. v. Banco Popular De Puerto Rico

NY.53589; 617 N.Y.S.2d 157; 208 A.D.2d 389 (1994)

    • € 0,99
    • € 0,99

Publisher Description

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered October 26, 1993, which granted defendants' motion
to dismiss the complaint at the close of plaintiff's case pursuant to CPLR 4401 and awarded judgment to defendants, unanimously
affirmed, with costs. The trial court properly determined that plaintiff did not establish a prima facie case on any of the three causes of action
in the complaint. In that regard, the law is settled that in order to establish fraud, the following elements must be demonstrated:
(1) misrepresentation of a material fact; (2) scienter; (3) justifiable reliance; and (4) injury or damages (Gouldsbury v.
Dan's Supreme Supermarket, 154 A.D.2d 509, 510-511, 546 N.Y.S.2d 379, lv denied 75 N.Y.2d 701). Plaintiff's proof failed to
demonstrate most of the allegations of fraud. As was explained in Brown v. Lockwood, 76 A.D.2d 721, 731, 432 N.Y.S.2d 186
[citations omitted], "it is a general rule that fraud cannot be predicated upon statements which are promissory in nature
at the time they are made and which relate to future actions or conduct. Mere unfulfilled promissory statements as to what
will be done in the future are not actionable as fraud . . . .").

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1994
6 October
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
3
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
73
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of New York

Philipp Brothers Export Corporation Philipp Brothers Export Corporation
1982
Matter Lora Thaler v. Richard M. Thaler Matter Lora Thaler v. Richard M. Thaler
1968
Matter Frank Dinino v. Dana Deima Matter Frank Dinino v. Dana Deima
1991
Tom and Jerry v. Nebraska Liquor Control Tom and Jerry v. Nebraska Liquor Control
1968
Hwesu S. Murray Hwesu S. Murray
1991
Bsl Development Corp. Bsl Development Corp.
1991