![Pavey v. Conley](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Pavey v. Conley](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Pavey v. Conley
544 F.3D 739, 528 F.3D 494, 2008.C07.0000480
-
- € 0,99
-
- € 0,99
Publisher Description
The question presented by this interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) is whether a prisoner plaintiff in a suit for damages governed by the Prison Litigation Reform Act is entitled by the Seventh Amendment to a jury trial on any debatable factual issues relating to the defense of failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The district court answered yes.