![Rehm v. Rehm](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Rehm v. Rehm](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Rehm v. Rehm
NC.40199; 409 S.E.2d 723; 104 N.C. App. 490 (1991)
-
- € 0,99
-
- € 0,99
Publisher Description
{PA} Page 492} [1] The basic issue for our determination is whether the trial court erred in determining that defendant cohabited
with someone of the opposite sex. For the reasons below, we affirm the order of the trial court.