Sam Italiano and Joe Italiano v. State

It is stated by plaintiffs in error that two questions are involved in the appeal, first, the legality of the search of Joe
Italiano and the competency of testimony obtained from him following his arrest without warrant; second, the propriety of
the action of the judge in refusing to withdraw the trial jury, thereby allowing them to hear the arresting officer's testimony
offered to show his authority for arresting without a warrant, hence, the admissibility of the evidence he obtained pursuant
to his apprehension of Joe Italiano.