![Sunderland v. Lockheed Martin Aeronautical Systems Support Co.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Sunderland v. Lockheed Martin Aeronautical Systems Support Co.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Sunderland v. Lockheed Martin Aeronautical Systems Support Co.
130 Cal.App.4th 1, 29 Cal.Rptr.3d 665, 2005 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6766, 70 Cal. Comp. Cases 839, 05 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4942, CA.0005135(2005)
-
- € 0,99
-
- € 0,99
Beschrijving uitgever
In this appeal we discuss the differing purposes of the workers' compensation law and the respondeat superior doctrine of
vicarious employer liability. We hold that the "commercial traveler rule" of workers' compensation law may not be incorporated
into the respondeat superior doctrine.