Taxpayers To Limit Campaign Spending V. Fair Political Practices Commission Taxpayers To Limit Campaign Spending V. Fair Political Practices Commission

Taxpayers To Limit Campaign Spending V. Fair Political Practices Commission

    • € 0,99
    • € 0,99

Publisher Description

The California Constitution provides: "If provisions of 2 or more measures approved at the same election conflict, those of the measure receiving the highest affirmative vote shall prevail." (Const., art. II, § 10, subd. (b). Hereafter, section 10(b).)*fn1 Rules of statutory construction, however, require an attempt to reconcile statutory provisions relating to the same subject matter whenever possible in order to avoid conflict and give effect to every provision. The threshold question in this case is whether section 10(b) either permits application of these rules of construction to competing initiative measures, or contemplates that only the provisions of the measure receiving the highest affirmative vote shall become effective. The question is one of  first impression in the application of section 10(b).

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1990
1 November
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
99
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
125.8
KB

More Books by Supreme Court Of California

Rosicrucian Fellowship V. Rosicrucian Fellowship Non-Sectarian Church Rosicrucian Fellowship V. Rosicrucian Fellowship Non-Sectarian Church
1952
Borre v. State Bar of California Borre v. State Bar of California
1991
Kipp v. Kipp Kipp v. Kipp
1954
Donovan v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County Donovan v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
1952
Housing Authority v. City of Los Angeles Housing Authority v. City of Los Angeles
1953
Schlothan v. Rusalem Schlothan v. Rusalem
1953