![Texas Const. Co. v. H. & P.E. Local Union No. 101](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Texas Const. Co. v. H. & P.E. Local Union No. 101](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Texas Const. Co. v. H. & P.E. Local Union No. 101
178 Kan. 422, 286 P.2d 160, KS.0042155(1955)
-
- € 0,99
-
- € 0,99
Publisher Description
The opinion of the court was delivered by The sole question presented in this appeal is whether the trial
court had jurisdiction of the subject matter. Appellants contend
it did not. We summarize or quote portions of the record bearing upon the
question presented as follows: