![[U] Bryant v. Myers](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![[U] Bryant v. Myers](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
[U] Bryant v. Myers
C09.40570 (1994)
-
- € 0,99
-
- € 0,99
Publisher Description
MEMORANDUM* Gregory Bryant, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his habeas corpus
petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Bryant contends that the California court's retroactive application of a
judicial decision violated his due process rights under the Ex Post Facto Clause and the Equal Protection Clause. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2253 and 1291 and review de novo a district court's habeas corpus decision.
See Desire v. Attorney General of California, 969 F.2d 802, 804 (9th Cir. 1992). We affirm. I. BACKGROUND