[U] In re Smasne [U] In re Smasne

[U] In re Smasne

115 WASH.APP. 1034, 2003.WA.0000199

    • € 0,99
    • € 0,99

Publisher Description

Michelle Smasne was found in contempt of court for failing to follow the terms of the parties parenting plan. She filed a motion to revise the commissioners ruling, which was denied. We remand for findings regarding evidence of bad faith, if any, on the part of Ms. Smasne as well as a lack of a reasonable excuse, if any, for failing to comply with the order. If an order of contempt is supported by the findings, the commissioner must also comply with the terms of RCW 26.09.160(2)(b)(i)-(iii). Although Robert Smasne originally filed a cross- appeal requesting attorney fees for having to respond to this appeal, he did not brief the issue and it was deemed waived by our court clerk.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2003
13 February
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
4
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
49.2
KB

More Books by Washington Court of Appeals

[U] State v. Xayasenesouk [U] State v. Xayasenesouk
1999
Blinka v. Washington State Bar Blinka v. Washington State Bar
2001
Falkner v. Foshaug Falkner v. Foshaug
2001
[U] State v. Averill [U] State v. Averill
2001
[U] State v. Stiffler [U] State v. Stiffler
2001
[U] State v. Clark [U] State v. Clark
2001