[U] James v. Mayor [U] James v. Mayor

[U] James v. Mayor

977 F.2d 572, 1992.C04.44964

    • € 0,99
    • € 0,99

Publisher Description

Per Curiam: Paul James appeals from the district court's order dismissing his complaint as a result of improper venue. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate Judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. James v. Mayor of Durham, No. CA-92-725-3 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 25, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process AFFIRMED Disposition AFFIRMED

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1992
22 October
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
1
Page
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
48
KB

More Books by Fourth Circuit U.S. Court Of Appeals

Moody v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co. Moody v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.
1995
United States v. Beafore United States v. Beafore
1996
Cranfill v. Winston-Salem Housing Authority Cranfill v. Winston-Salem Housing Authority
1996
United States v. Zervos United States v. Zervos
1996
Shelton v. United States Shelton v. United States
1996
Jones v. Sprint International Jones v. Sprint International
1996