01/13/95 State Minnesota V. James Robert Porter 01/13/95 State Minnesota V. James Robert Porter

01/13/95 State Minnesota V. James Robert Porter

    • 4,00 kr
    • 4,00 kr

Publisher Description

1. Statements in a prosecutor's closing argument suggesting that jurors would be suckers for acquitting a defendant and that there is no salve or sedative that would make them feel good about acquitting a defendant constitute serious misconduct.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1995
13 January
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
18
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
68.5
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Minnesota

Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission
1997
State v. Melvin S. Waltz State v. Melvin S. Waltz
1952
Carol Virginia Gleason v. Ben Geary Carol Virginia Gleason v. Ben Geary
1943
C. M. Dahl and Another v. Henry T C. M. Dahl and Another v. Henry T
1938
Pearl and A. J. Martin v. Josephine Pearl and A. J. Martin v. Josephine
1931
State Ex Rel. Ivan and Mildred Bowen V. State Ex Rel. Ivan and Mildred Bowen V.
1930