108 Holdings, Ltd. v. City of Rohnert Park 108 Holdings, Ltd. v. City of Rohnert Park

108 Holdings, Ltd. v. City of Rohnert Park

136 CAL.APP.4TH 186, 38 CAL.RPTR.3D 589, 2006 DAILY JOURNAL D.A.R. 1304, 36 ENVTL. L. REP. 20,031, 06 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 970, 2006.CA.0000841

    • 4,00 kr
    • 4,00 kr

Publisher Description

In these cases we are asked to determine whether a public defender whose office has previously represented a witness for the prosecution is subject to automatic (or virtually automatic) disqualification for conflict of interest. Although we cannot establish a bright-line rule, we do hold that disqualification is not mandatory whenever the situation arises; further, that disqualification in one of the two cases before us was clearly improper.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2006
31 January
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
29
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
87.5
KB

More Books by In the Court of Appeal of the State of California First Appellate District Division Five

Hayward Area Planning Association v. City of Hayward Hayward Area Planning Association v. City of Hayward
2005
Milligan v. Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District Milligan v. Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District
2004
In re Vanessa M. In re Vanessa M.
2006
Ibm Personal Pension Plan v. City and County of San Francisco Ibm Personal Pension Plan v. City and County of San Francisco
2005
In re Bartholomew D. In re Bartholomew D.
2005
Honig v. San Francisco Planning Department Honig v. San Francisco Planning Department
2005