Administrator Hired to Run City's Health Insurance Program Owes Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Just As Insurer would Owe Duty (Recent Court Decisions) Administrator Hired to Run City's Health Insurance Program Owes Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Just As Insurer would Owe Duty (Recent Court Decisions)

Administrator Hired to Run City's Health Insurance Program Owes Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Just As Insurer would Owe Duty (Recent Court Decisions‪)‬

Journal of Risk and Insurance 2004, March, 71, 1

    • 25,00 kr
    • 25,00 kr

Publisher Description

Cary v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co., 68 P.3d 462 (Supreme Court of Colorado--April 21, 2003) The city of Arvada, Colorado, provided a self-funded health insurance program to its employees through the Arvada Medical and Disability Program Trust Fund. The Trust was administered by United of Omaha and Mutual of Omaha of Colorado. Under the arrangement, the Trust was governed by a Board of Trustees but had no employee staff of its own. Rather, the Trust relied on United and Mutual for claims administration. The Trust's arrangement with United was akin to stop-loss insurance for the Trust in that the Trust was responsible for the first $75,000 of covered payments for employee illness, with United responsible for amounts between $75,000 and $1 million.

GENRE
Business & Personal Finance
RELEASED
2004
1 March
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
11
Pages
PUBLISHER
American Risk and Insurance Association, Inc.
SIZE
280.1
KB

More Books by Journal of Risk and Insurance

The Relations Among Organizational and Distribution Forms and Capital and Asset Risk Structures in the Life Insurance Industry. The Relations Among Organizational and Distribution Forms and Capital and Asset Risk Structures in the Life Insurance Industry.
2003
Crop Price Indemnified Loans for Farmers: A Pilot Experiment in Rural Ghana. Crop Price Indemnified Loans for Farmers: A Pilot Experiment in Rural Ghana.
2011
Supreme Court Endorses Broad ERISA Preemption of Pure Eligibility Determinations by Plan Administrator; Federal Court the Exclusive Forum for Such Claims; Overlapping State Law Causes of Action Not Permitted (Recent Court Decisions) (Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) Supreme Court Endorses Broad ERISA Preemption of Pure Eligibility Determinations by Plan Administrator; Federal Court the Exclusive Forum for Such Claims; Overlapping State Law Causes of Action Not Permitted (Recent Court Decisions) (Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
2004
Injury to Building Caused by Negligent Soil Analysis May Constitute Occurrence Under CGL That is Not Precluded by Business Risk Exclusions Or Similar Limitations on Coverage (Recent Court Decisions) (Commercial General Liability) Injury to Building Caused by Negligent Soil Analysis May Constitute Occurrence Under CGL That is Not Precluded by Business Risk Exclusions Or Similar Limitations on Coverage (Recent Court Decisions) (Commercial General Liability)
2004
Contracting Incentives and Compensation for Property-Liability Insurer Executives. Contracting Incentives and Compensation for Property-Liability Insurer Executives.
2004
Incentives for Managing Accounting Information: Property-Liability Insurer Stock-Charter Conversions. Incentives for Managing Accounting Information: Property-Liability Insurer Stock-Charter Conversions.
2004