C.M. Asfahl Agency V. Tensor C.M. Asfahl Agency V. Tensor

C.M. Asfahl Agency V. Tensor

    • 4,00 kr
    • 4,00 kr

Publisher Description

Appellant and appellee, C.M. Asfahl Agency (the Agency), plaintiff below, entered into sales and marketing agreements with appellants and appellees, Tensor, Inc. (Tensor), Quality Drilling Technology, Inc. (QDT), and Quantum Solutions, Inc. (QSI) (collectively, the Tensor parties), defendants below, which entities eventually merged into a single Tensor entity. *fn1 In 1998, appellee, Allied Signal, Inc. (Allied Signal), also a defendant below, and Tensor executed an agreement by which Allied Signal purchased the Tensor assets. Allied Signal maintained that, under the terms of the asset-purchase agreement and because it had purchased only the Tensor assets, the Agency no longer had any right to receive commissions under its sales and marketing agreements with the Tensor parties. Asfahl *fn2 disagreed and, through the Agency, sued the Tensor parties, Allied Signal, George F. Roberts, a Tensor principal, and Robert L. Waters, an Allied Signal principal. *fn3

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2004
29 January
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
70
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
91.1
KB
Metropolitan Transit Authority v. Meb Engineering Metropolitan Transit Authority v. Meb Engineering
2004
Taylor v. State Taylor v. State
2003
Urena v. Western Investments Urena v. Western Investments
2003
Aleman v. Ben E. Keith Co. Aleman v. Ben E. Keith Co.
2007
Garza v. Hibernia National Bank Garza v. Hibernia National Bank
2007
Nicholson v. Fifth Third Bank Nicholson v. Fifth Third Bank
2007