In re Personal Restraint Petition of Lonnie Lee Burton In re Personal Restraint Petition of Lonnie Lee Burton

In re Personal Restraint Petition of Lonnie Lee Burton

WA.40711; 910 P.2d 1295; 80 Wash. App. 573 (1996)

    • 4,00 kr
    • 4,00 kr

Publisher Description

[80 WashApp Page 575] AGID, J. -- Lonnie Burton and Alonzo Warren petition for relief from sanctions imposed as a result of prison disciplinary proceedings arguing that those sanctions constitute an unlawful restraint within the meaning of RAP 16.4(c). They contend that the requirement that they show actual and substantial prejudice in order to maintain a personal restraint petition (PRP) in a prison disciplinary proceeding has been eliminated by the Washington Supreme Court's holding in In re Cashaw, 123 Wash. 2d 138, 866 P.2d 8 (1994). We conclude that Cashaw does not apply to prison disciplinary proceedings. Because neither Burton nor Warren has shown that he sustained actual and substantial prejudice or that his minimal due process rights were violated as a result of the proceedings, we deny both of their PRPs.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1996
12 February
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
24
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
81.4
KB

More Books by Division One Court of Appeals of Washington

Washington v. Farmer Washington v. Farmer
1996
Birchler v. Castello Land Co. Birchler v. Castello Land Co.
1996
Barry v. Johns Barry v. Johns
1996
Washington v. Drew Washington v. Drew
1995
Washington v. Gropper Washington v. Gropper
1995
Saldin Securities Inc. v. Snohomish County Saldin Securities Inc. v. Snohomish County
1996