Primm v. King
1958.NC.40007; 249 N.C. 228; 106 S.E.2D 223
-
- 4,00 kr
-
- 4,00 kr
Publisher Description
Among other things, however, this defendant excepts to and assigns as error the following portion of the charge to the jury: "Incidentally, let me say here, ladies and gentlemen, there being no evidence as to what kind of zone or district this was, that the 55 miles an hour speed law would apply here, and that a speed under 55 miles an hour would not be in violation of the speed law, and one above that would be."
People State New York v. Anthony King
1984
Fidelity And Deposit Company Maryland v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
1983
Credit Alliance Corporation Et Al. v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
1985
Incorporated Village Nyack v. Daytop Village
1991
Roberta Rinaldo Et Al. v. Arthur Mcgovern
1991
People State New York v. Timothy B. Cooper
1991