Sagaydak v. Gonzales Sagaydak v. Gonzales

Sagaydak v. Gonzales

405 F.3D 1035, 2005 DAILY JOURNAL D.A.R. 5076, 05 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 3709, 2005.C09.0001541

    • 4,00 kr
    • 4,00 kr

Publisher Description

To be eligible for asylum, an alien must, absent changed or extraordinary circumstances, file an asylum application within one year of arriving in the United States. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2). In the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, Congress made clear that "no court shall have jurisdiction to review any determination of the Attorney General" with respect to whether the alien had met the one-year deadline or had failed to satisfy this time limit because of extraordinary circumstances. Pub.L. 104-208, § 604, 110 Stat. 3009-691 (1996) (codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3)); see also Hakeem v. INS, 273 F.3d 812, 815 (9th Cir. 2001). However, in this case, we are confronted with an unusual situation: The lead petitioner argued that his untimely filing was due to extraordinary circumstances, but both the Immigration Judge ("IJ") and the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") failed to address the issue. We hold that when the Attorney General fails to make a "determination," this court has jurisdiction to grant the petition and remand the case so that the agency charged with making this determination can properly do so.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2005
4 May
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
24
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
70.7
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Alaska

Shelly Gunnerud v. State Alaska Shelly Gunnerud v. State Alaska
1980
Debra Gorrell Julsen v. Erick Harold Debra Gorrell Julsen v. Erick Harold
1987
Beers v. Jim Robison Beers v. Jim Robison
1985
Butler v. Dunlap Butler v. Dunlap
1997
State v. Arbuckle State v. Arbuckle
1997
Benedict v. Key Bank of Alaska Benedict v. Key Bank of Alaska
1996