01/07/98 Weddington Productions V. Stephen Flick Et 01/07/98 Weddington Productions V. Stephen Flick Et

01/07/98 Weddington Productions V. Stephen Flick Et

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

The primary issue on this appeal involves an entertainment industry ADR (alternative dispute resolution) procedure gone seriously awry. The ADR procedure took place in two phases. After a preliminary injunction and related contempt proceeding, the parties stipulated to a voluntary mediation. The mediation yielded a one-page memorandum covering many material terms, but also providing that the parties would "formalize" additional material terms later. Anticipating possible dispute over these additional terms, the parties also agreed to "reserve jurisdiction" in the mediator "to resolve any dispute" over the "documentation" of their settlement and to "administer any process, including fact-finding, for a full implementation of the settlement."

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1998
7 de enero
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
44
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
90.2
KB

Más libros de Second Appellate District, Division Two Court of Appeal of California

Rowland v. Shell Oil Co. Rowland v. Shell Oil Co.
1986
People v. Lewis People v. Lewis
1987
In re Anthony Freeman on Habeas Corpus In re Anthony Freeman on Habeas Corpus
1980
Regents of University of California v. City of Los Angeles Regents of University of California v. City of Los Angeles
1979
City of Los Angeles v. Cannon City of Los Angeles v. Cannon
1976
Trani v. R. G. Hohman Enterprises Inc. Trani v. R. G. Hohman Enterprises Inc.
1975