1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation and Development Commission 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation and Development Commission

1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation and Development Commission

239 P.3D 272, 237 OR.APP. 213, 2010.OR.0000619

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

Petitioners seek judicial review of an order of the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) approving the City of Woodburns amendment of its urban growth boundary (UGB) to include an additional 409 acres for industrial uses. Petitioners myriad contentions on review pertain to two basic issues. First, did the city include more industrial land in its UGB than was necessary to accommodate its needs over the 20-year planning period in violation of Statewide Land Use Planning Goals 9 and 14? Second, assuming that there was a need for the additional industrial land, should the city have selected different properties for inclusion in the UGB pursuant to ORS 197.298 and the locational factors in Goal 14? For reasons that we will explain, we conclude that the LCDCs order is inadequate for judicial review with respect to its treatment of the first of those two issues, and, accordingly, reverse and remand the order for reconsideration, which, in turn, obviates the need to address the second issue.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2010
8 de septiembre
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
18
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
80.9
KB

Más libros de En Banc Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ex Parte Bernardo Eureste Ex Parte Bernardo Eureste
1986
Ex Parte Martin Lee Burns Ex Parte Martin Lee Burns
1980
Ex Parte Ronald Lee Watson. Ex Parte Ronald Lee Watson.
1980
Michener Appeal. Michener Appeal.
1955
Hillegass Estate Hillegass Estate
1968
Petock v. Asante Petock v. Asante
2010