Andrew L. Youngquist, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co. Andrew L. Youngquist, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.

Andrew L. Youngquist, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co‪.‬

625 N.W.2d 178, 2001.MN.0000476

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

Affirmed in part and remanded OPINION Following the district court's grant of summary judgment in its favor, appellant insured contends that the district court erred in limiting its recovery of damages and attorney fees to $8,866.58. Respondent insurance company filed a notice of review challenging the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the insured. Because the insurer breached its duty to defend and indemnify the insured, and the district court's award of costs and attorney fees was proper, we affirm in part. Nonetheless, we remand for a factual finding as to whether the insured paid its insurance deductible before or after tendering its defense to the insurer. FACTS

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2001
24 de abril
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
21
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
74
KB

Más libros de Minnesota Court of Appeals

In re Civil Commitment of Ramey In re Civil Commitment of Ramey
2002
State v. Pearson State v. Pearson
2000
Juelich v. Yamazaki Mazak Optionics Corp. Juelich v. Yamazaki Mazak Optionics Corp.
2003
In re Children of Wildey In re Children of Wildey
2003
Tollefson Development, Inc. v. Mccarthy Tollefson Development, Inc. v. Mccarthy
2003
State v. Cunningham State v. Cunningham
2003