Bennett v. State Bennett v. State

Bennett v. State

878 N.E.2D 836, 2008.IN.0000023

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

The contention in this appeal is that to obtain a conviction for theft, the State must prove the defendant intended to deprive the owner of its use -- permanently. The Court of Appeals correctly rejected this contention.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2008
9 de enero
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
1
Página
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENTAS
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
49.8
KB

Más libros de In the Indiana Supreme Court

Wright v. State Wright v. State
2005
Young v. Tri-Etch Young v. Tri-Etch
2003
Miller v. State Miller v. State
1999
Cantrell v. Morris Cantrell v. Morris
2006
K.S. v. State K.S. v. State
2006
Childress v. State Childress v. State
2006