G.E.M. Sundries Co. v. Johnson & Johnson G.E.M. Sundries Co. v. Johnson & Johnson

G.E.M. Sundries Co. v. Johnson & Johnson

C09.196 , 283 F.2d 86 (1960)

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

Before POPE, MERRILL and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges. MERRILL, Circuit Judge: This appeal is taken from the Supreme Court of the Territory (now State) of Hawaii, pursuant to 28
U.S.C. 1293. It concerns the validity of the Hawaii Fair Trade Act (Â 205-21, 205-25, Revised Laws of Hawaii, 1955), which
legalizes contracts by which manufacturers of trademarked goods bind retailers, both contracting and non-contracting, to maintain
resale prices fixed by the manufacturer in the accepted contracts. Appellant contends, contrary to the judgment of the Hawaii
Supreme Court, that this Act is invalid under 3 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 3, and, in its application to non-contracting
retailers, that the Act violates the due process of law clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States
Constitution.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1960
12 de agosto
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
6
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENTAS
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
63.6
KB

Más libros de United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Buono v. Norton Buono v. Norton
2004
United States v. Navidad-Marcos United States v. Navidad-Marcos
2004
United States v. Joyce United States v. Joyce
2004
In re Marshall In re Marshall
2004
Jones v. E*Trade Mortgage Corporation Jones v. E*Trade Mortgage Corporation
2005
Dees v. Billy Dees v. Billy
2005