G. Stefane Millhouse Ii v. Ronald G. Wiesenthal G. Stefane Millhouse Ii v. Ronald G. Wiesenthal

G. Stefane Millhouse Ii v. Ronald G. Wiesenthal

1989.TX.40591; 775 S.W.2D 626, 32 TEX. SUP. J. 332

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

This case presents the question of whether the determination of causation in an appellate legal malpractice case is a question of law or a question of fact. This is an issue of first impression in Texas. G. Stefane Millhouse II brought suit against his former attorney, Ronald G. Wiesenthal, for damages caused by Wiesenthals failure to timely file a statement of facts with the court of appeals in an earlier case in which Wiesenthal had represented Millhouse. The trial court granted Wiesenthals motion for summary judgment, concluding as a matter of law that Wiesenthals failure to file the statement of facts in the earlier case was not the cause of Millhouses loss of that case on appeal. The court of appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court. 757 S.W.2d 103. We affirm.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1989
19 de abril
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
8
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENTAS
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
66.8
KB

Más libros de Supreme Court Of Utah

Emerald Oil Co. v. State Tax Commission Emerald Oil Co. v. State Tax Commission
1954
Dillon Smith v. Utah Central Credit Union Dillon Smith v. Utah Central Credit Union
1986
Kirchgestner v. Denver & Rio Grande Kirchgestner v. Denver & Rio Grande
1951
Richard Rousay v. Board Review Industrial Richard Rousay v. Board Review Industrial
1987
Utah Power and Light Company v. Public Utah Power and Light Company v. Public
1985
State Utah v. Victor Lazcano Gardea State Utah v. Victor Lazcano Gardea
1985