Gabriel Sinka v. Northern Commercial Gabriel Sinka v. Northern Commercial

Gabriel Sinka v. Northern Commercial

AK.83 , 491 P.2d 116 (1971)

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

CONNOR, Justice. OPINION These are actions to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from an alleged breach of warranty
in the sale of goods. The sole question before us is whether the two-year statute of limitations for personal injury actions
applies. If so, the plaintiffs are barred, as these actions were brought more than two years after the sale. Plaintiffs assert
a right to bring suit under the four-year period of limitation contained in the Uniform Commercial Code. In one complaint it is alleged that Josephine Tucker, of Emmonak, Alaska, purchased what she believed to be pearl Kerosene
from Northern Commercial Company on October 28, 1967. On that same date, upon lighting a burner lamp in which she had placed
the fuel, there was an explosion and fire which inflicted burns on Josephine Tucker and her husband Jimmy Tucker, and destroyed
their dwelling. Josephine died as a result of those burns on December 8, 1967.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1971
30 de noviembre
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
8
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENTAS
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
62.6
KB

Más libros de Supreme Court of Alaska

Beers v. Jim Robison Beers v. Jim Robison
1985
Butler v. Dunlap Butler v. Dunlap
1997
State v. Arbuckle State v. Arbuckle
1997
Benedict v. Key Bank of Alaska Benedict v. Key Bank of Alaska
1996
Voigt v. Snowden Voigt v. Snowden
1996
Ahwinona v. State Ahwinona v. State
1996