Gaetana Mazzola v. Mary Mazzola
NY.44543; 338 N.Y.S.2d 911; 40 A.D.2d 1017 (1972)
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
In our opinion, it was incumbent upon defendant to come forward with matter of an evidentiary nature to demonstrate the presence of triable issues. This the defendant failed to do. She failed to support by the requisite evidentiary demonstration her contention that a triable issue of fact exists, thereby precluding summary judgment relief. The motion should have been granted (Steingart Assoc. v. Sandler, 28 A.D.2d 801; Holdridge v. Town of Burlington, 32 A.D.2d 581). Disposition Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted.
Más libros de Supreme Court of New York
Matter Richard M. Kessel v. Public Service Commission State New York Et Al.
1987
Donna K. A. Dicocco v. Capital Area Community Health Plan
1988
Robert M. Gabrielli v. Chris Cornazzani
1988
William J. Kiernan Et Al. v. Gloria Thompson
1987
Dennis Pemberton v. Dolphin Development Corporation Et Al.
1987
Robert Jefferds v. Harold W. Ellis
1987