Ganey v. Wilson Ganey v. Wilson

Ganey v. Wilson

23 F.3d 400, 1994.C04.44959

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

Per Curiam: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his Rule 60(b) motion. Our review of the record and the district
court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Ganey v. Wilson, No. CA-89-507-CT (E.D.N.C. Mar. 22, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1994
23 de mayo
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
1
Página
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENTAS
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
46.8
KB

Más libros de Fourth Circuit U.S. Court Of Appeals

Moody v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co. Moody v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.
1995
United States v. Beafore United States v. Beafore
1996
Cranfill v. Winston-Salem Housing Authority Cranfill v. Winston-Salem Housing Authority
1996
United States v. Zervos United States v. Zervos
1996
Shelton v. United States Shelton v. United States
1996
Jones v. Sprint International Jones v. Sprint International
1996