Garofalo v. Princess Cruises
85 CAL.APP.4TH 1060, 102 CAL.RPTR.2D 754, 2000.CA.0042977 , 1 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 82, 2001 DAILY JOURNAL D.A.R. 93
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
In this case we consider whether a conservator of the person may withhold artificial nutrition and hydration from a conscious conservatee who is not terminally ill, comatose, or in a persistent vegetative state, and who has not left formal instructions for health care or appointed an agent or surrogate for health care decisions. Interpreting Probate Code section 2355 in light of the relevant provisions of the California Constitution, we conclude a conservator may not withhold artificial nutrition and hydration from such a person absent clear and convincing evidence the conservators decision is in accordance with either the conservatees own wishes or best interest.