Haight Ashbury Free Clinics Haight Ashbury Free Clinics

Haight Ashbury Free Clinics

110 CAL.RPTR.3D 129, 184 CAL.APP.4TH 1539, 2010 DAILY JOURNAL D.A.R. 7845, 10 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 6551, 2010.CA.0003944

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

Respondent Haight Ashbury Free Clinics, Inc., (HAFCI) filed a complaint against appellants Happening House Ventures (HHV) and David E. Smith alleging Smith had violated his fiduciary duties to HAFCI. HHV and Smith filed a motion to strike under the SLAPP statute (Code Civ. Proc., 425.16 ), arguing that two of the causes of action HAFCI alleged must be dismissed because they were based in part on constitutionally protected activity. The trial court disagreed and denied the motion. HHV and Smith now appeal arguing the trial court erred when it denied their motion. We agree and will hold that acts that are protected under the SLAPP statute are not "merely incidental" to a cause of action simply because they represent a relatively small number of many alleged wrongful acts.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2010
26 de mayo
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
40
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENTAS
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
99.9
KB

Más libros de Colorado Supreme Court

Padilla v. School Dist. No. 1 in the City and County of Denver Padilla v. School Dist. No. 1 in the City and County of Denver
2001
In re J.P. Meyer Trucking and Construction In re J.P. Meyer Trucking and Construction
2001
People v. Doherty People v. Doherty
1996
People v. Woodrum People v. Woodrum
1996
In re Title In re Title
1996
People v. Bauder People v. Bauder
1997