Hamel v. Winkworth Hamel v. Winkworth

Hamel v. Winkworth

102 N.M. 133, 692 P.2D 58, 1984.NM.40027

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

Plaintiffs recovered in a medical malpractice action against defendant. Plaintiffs appeal on the grounds that the trial court inadvertently failed to give a special interrogatory on the need for future medical care. NMSA 1978, ? 41-5-7(A) (Repl. Pamp.1982). The trial court ruled that plaintiffs had waived their rights by failing to bring the inadvertent omission to its attention. We agree.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1984
21 de noviembre
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
3
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENTAS
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
50.7
KB

Más libros de New Mexico Court of Appeals

Sandoval County Board of Commissioners v. Ruiz Sandoval County Board of Commissioners v. Ruiz
1995
Joseph C. Monsanto v. Mary Elizabeth Monsanto Joseph C. Monsanto v. Mary Elizabeth Monsanto
1995
Clayton v. Farmington City Council Clayton v. Farmington City Council
1995
In re Estate of Strozzi In re Estate of Strozzi
1995
State v. Curry State v. Curry
2002
State v. Fike State v. Fike
2002