Hardy v. City Optical Inc. Hardy v. City Optical Inc.

Hardy v. City Optical Inc‪.‬

1994.C07.40275 ; 39 F.3D 765

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

POSNER, Chief Judge. Lisa Hardy brought suit against City Optical, Inc., an Indiana seller of contact lenses, and the optometrists employed by it, charging violations of both federal antitrust law and the law of Indiana. Hardy had obtained contact lenses from City Optical but discovered that she could buy them more cheaply from Lens Express, a mail-order seller in Florida. She asked the optometrist at City Optical who had fitted her with her contact lenses to give her the contact-lens specifications for forwarding to Lens Express. He refused. This meant that to get fitted with lenses from Lens Express she would have to go to another optometrist and incur the expense of an examination in order to obtain the requisite specifications, without which Lens Express would not have enough information to be able to provide contact lenses that would fit her.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1994
7 de noviembre
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
16
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENTAS
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
62.2
KB

Más libros de United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Marine v. Maersk Line Inc. Marine v. Maersk Line Inc.
1993
Mulholland v. Aaa Food Service Inc. Mulholland v. Aaa Food Service Inc.
1990
Rosenbaum v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Rosenbaum v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
1993
Cannaday v. Gibas Cannaday v. Gibas
1992
Holman v. Lotter Holman v. Lotter
1992
Mccabe v. Caleel Mccabe v. Caleel
1991