Harkness v. Harkness Harkness v. Harkness

Harkness v. Harkness

227 MICH.APP. 581, 577 N.W.2D 116, 1998.MI.427

Michigan Court of Appeals
    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

When interpreting contingent fee agreements, we construe ambiguous terms against the drafting attorney in the absence of a clear showing that the parties had a contrary intent.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1998
30 de enero
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
18
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENTAS
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
58.7
KB

Más libros de Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Compeau People v. Compeau
People v. Compeau
2001
People v. Pesquera People v. Pesquera
People v. Pesquera
2001
Nations Banc Mortgage Corporation of Georgia v. Luptak Nations Banc Mortgage Corporation of Georgia v. Luptak
Nations Banc Mortgage Corporation of Georgia v. Luptak
2000
People v. Canales People v. Canales
People v. Canales
2000
Bell v. Seabury Bell v. Seabury
Bell v. Seabury
2000
People v. Woods People v. Woods
People v. Woods
2000