Harold Keel v. State Texas
1968.TX.41108; 434 S.W.2D 687
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
The sufficiency of the evidence is not questioned. The state proved by testimony of fifteen year old Gayle , the girl named in the indictment; sixteen year old Martha , and appellants adult employee Faye , that during the time they were in appellants apartment in January or February of 1966, appellant took off his clothes and exposed his male organ or penis to Gayle and Martha.
Más libros de Fifth District, Dallas Court of Civil Appeals of Texas
Paul Bodovsky and Charles Everson v. Texoma National Bank Sherman
1979
Haney Electric Company and Marion Willard Stewart v. Thomas M. Hurst
1981
Tm Productions v. Blue Mountain Broadcasting Co.
1981
David Bryce London v. Texas Power & Light Co.
1981
Charles F. Bantuelle v. James F. Renfroe
1981
Zolan A. Wilkins v. James Bain
1981