Harris Sanders Et Al. v. Max Schiffer Et Al. Harris Sanders Et Al. v. Max Schiffer Et Al.

Harris Sanders Et Al. v. Max Schiffer Et Al‪.‬

NY.42154; 349 N.E.2d 869; 39 N.Y.2d 727 (1976)

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

[39 N.Y.2d 727 Page 729] Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be modified. The granting of the motions to dismiss the complaint and to cancel the associated notice of pendency should be affirmed. Such affirmance, however, is without prejudice to the right of appellants, if they be so advised, to apply at Special Term for leave to serve an amended complaint, notwithstanding that they failed to state a desire to plead again in their opposing papers and that they do not urge such disposition now. On such application, if any, a copy of the proposed amended complaint shall be submitted to the court, accompanied by a disclosure of the evidentiary facts which would support the claim or claims set forth in the proposed amended complaint and will justify the granting of such leave (CPLR 3211, subd [e]).

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1976
6 de abril
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
1
Página
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENTAS
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
57.7
KB

Más libros de Court of Appeals of New York

Hugh Morgan v. Aristotle S. Onassis Hugh Morgan v. Aristotle S. Onassis
1958
Cantalino v. Danner Cantalino v. Danner
2001
People State New York v. William R. Miller People State New York v. William R. Miller
1987
People State New York v. Larry Burton Bennett People State New York v. Larry Burton Bennett
1987
Guardian Life Insurance Company America v. Merlin C. Schaefer Guardian Life Insurance Company America v. Merlin C. Schaefer
1987
People State New York v. Kevin Paulin People State New York v. Kevin Paulin
1987